Coventry City Vs Newcastle United FPL: Who Hauled And What It Means
The call — Coventry 4 Newcastle 1 — GW6, 12 October Cherif returned 12 points at £5.0m. One goal, one assist, three bonus, 77 minutes. Next to nobody owns him. That is the headline from the Coventry Building Society Arena. The score was 4-1. Coventry's goals came from across the squad. Rudoni (£4.9m) scored in 82 minutes for 7 points. Mfuni (£4.0m) came…
What has not being with FFIQ cost you this season?
One squad, picked before a ball was kicked and run for five gameweeks on three transfers — no hits taken. Scored on FPL’s own results.
Your name and your FPL team name. That is all it takes, and we will have your answer before you have finished reading this sentence.
↓ Start here — your name, then your team.
No FPL password, ever. We only read what FPL already publishes.
Now the part most managers opened this for. Hall, owned by about 2 in 10, played 90 minutes and scored zero points. The yellow-free blank with a four-goal concession wiped his return entirely. Wissa, also about 2 in 10, played 77 minutes and took 2. Barnes, roughly 1 in 10, played 90 and took 2. Three template Newcastle assets. Four points between them.
Newcastle's returns came from elsewhere. Botman (£5.0m) scored and hit the extra-defending bonus for 8 points — hardly anyone has him. N. Gonzalez (£5.5m) assisted with two bonus for 7 — same story, barely owned.
What it means for the deadline. Cherif is £5.0m, productive in this match, and owned by almost no one. One game is one game — Simms and Mfuni both scored from the bench, so Coventry's forward slots are contested, and his place is not confirmed by anything in front of us. That is the honest caveat. Hall's case is different: he started, he played 90, nothing in the facts flags him.
The call: Hall owners hold — a starter who blanks is not a starter who sits. Cherif goes on the watchlist at £5.0m; buy him the moment his starts stack up, not before.